Does Facemask Impact Diagnostic During Pulmonary Auscultation ?

Facemasks have been widely used in hospitals, especially since the emergence of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, often severely affecting respiratory functions. Masks protect patients from contagious airborne transmission, and are thus more specifically important for chronic respiratory disease (CRD) patients. However, masks also increase air resistance and thus work of breathing, which may impact pulmonary auscultation and diagnostic acuity, the primary respiratory examination This study is the first to assess the impact of facemasks on clinical auscultation diagnostic. Lung sounds from 29 patients were digitally recorded using an electronic stethoscope. For each patient, one recording was taken wearing a surgical mask and one without. Recorded signals were segmented in breath cycles using an autocorrelation algorithm. In total, 87 breath cycles were identified from sounds with mask, and 82 without mask. Time-frequency analysis of the signals was used to extract comparison features such as peak frequency, median frequency, band power, or spectral integration. All the features extracted in frequency content, its evolution, or power did not significantly differ between respiratory cycles with or without mask. This early stage study thus suggests minor impact on clinical diagnostic outcomes in pulmonary auscultation. However, further analysis is necessary such as on adventitious sounds characteristics differences with or without mask, to determine if facemask could lead to no discernible diagnostic outcome in clinical practice. Copyright (C) 2021 The Authors.

Model-based Patient Matching for in-parallel Multiplexing Mechanical Ventilation Support

Surges of COVID-19 infections could lead to insufficient supply of mechanical ventilators, and rationing of needed care. Multiplexing mechanical ventilators (co-MV) to serve multiple patients is a potential temporary solution. However, if patients are ventilated in parallel ventilation, there is currently no means to match ventilation requirements or patients, with no guidelines to date for co-MV. This research uses patient-specific clinically validated respiratory mechanics models to propose a method for patient matching and mechanical ventilator settings for two-patient co-MV under pressure control mode. The proposed method can simulate and estimate the resultant tidal volume of different combinations of co-ventilated patients. With both patients fulfilling the specified constraint under similar ventilation settings, the actual mechanical ventilator settings for co-MV are determined. This method allows clinicians to analyze in silico co-MV before clinical implementation. Copyright (C) 2021 The Authors.